Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 6-12

Impact of an effective tongue cleaner- A randomized double-blind, parallel design study


1 Senior Lecturer, Dept, o f Public Health Dentistry, I.T.S Dental College, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Professor and HOD, Public Health Dentistry, Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, India

Correspondence Address:
Mansi Atri
Senior Lecturer, Dept, o f Public Health Dentistry, I.T.S Dental College, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Introduction : In order to remove tongue biofilm and improve breath odor, specific instruments(tongue scrapers) or toothbrushes are used. Material & Methods: This study compared the effectiveness of a manual toothbrush that has atongue scraper on the back of its head and two commercially available tongue scrapers in reducingthe tongue coating and aerobic and anaerobic microbiota of the tongue dorsum. A randomized,negative controlled, double-blind, parallel design study for three different treatment interventionswas conducted. Results: All tongue cleaners showed a significant reduction in Winkel's tongue coating scoreswith significant values of reduction (p<0.001) of anaerobic bacterial count reported with plastic andmetal tongue scraper when compared to brush scraper. Conclusion: There was an effective reduction of bacterial load on tongue dorsum with the useof tongue cleaners, with maximum load reduction by using plastic tongue cleaners.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed568    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded108    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal