Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 424-428

Understanding “social reward”: A study on the teaching dental staff in states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana


1 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India
2 Department of Psychiatry, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, Telangana, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Malla Reddy Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
4 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India

Date of Web Publication15-Dec-2016

Correspondence Address:
V Siva Kalyan
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2319-5932.195843

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Introduction: Social reward is a result of human interactions that motivates and gives happiness. In this study, an attempt was made to understand various domains of the social reward of dental staff. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the individual differences in the value of social reward among dental staff working in teaching health-care institutions. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire-based study was conducted on dental staff working in teaching health-care institutions. Demographic data were collected. The social reward was assessed using Social Reward Questionnaire on a seven-point Likert scale. The mean value of each domain was calculated and compared based on the academic experience of the staff. The significance difference was tested using one-way ANOVA. Results: A total of 290 dental staff members of a mean age of 33.4 ± 6.2 years participated in the study. Those with academic experience of <1 year had a highest mean value with regard to domains such as admiration and sociability. The staff members of >11 years of experience had the highest mean value with regard to pro-social interaction. Conclusion: Understanding the individual differences in valuing social reward is useful to organizations in promoting a better work environment, contributes for pro-social behaviors among staff, helps in sustaining the worth, and contributes for positive human interactions.

Keywords: Dental staff, interpersonal relations, reward, social adjustment, social behavior


How to cite this article:
Kalyan V S, Manjula S, Kulkarni G, Sudhakar G, Padma T M, Pratap K. Understanding “social reward”: A study on the teaching dental staff in states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2016;14:424-8

How to cite this URL:
Kalyan V S, Manjula S, Kulkarni G, Sudhakar G, Padma T M, Pratap K. Understanding “social reward”: A study on the teaching dental staff in states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 4];14:424-8. Available from: http://www.jiaphd.org/text.asp?2016/14/4/424/195843


  Introduction Top


Humans cannot reside without a connection. Their life is to a mammoth extent a group life, and sociability is an innate feeling of a human.[1] One of the most famous statements by Aristotle “Man is by nature a social animal” (Politika ca. 328 BC)[2] fashioned inquisitiveness in quite a lot of disciplines to substantiate the perception of Aristotle by schooling the social nature of humans into quantifiable and noticeable aspects of human biology, psychology, and behavior.[3]

The elementary characteristic of a human being is his/her social nature. We humans get motivated to bond socially, and conspecificity exists in sharing experiences.[4],[5] To perform a task which is least specific, we tend to experience it together with friends rather than doing it alone (e.g., when people go to watch a movie, they go together either with a partner or a friend).[6] Research reveals that certain social stimuli are rewarding such as viewing static images of smiling faces or being liked and they, in turn, increase activation in the striatum, part of brain's reward network.[7] On the other hand, social anhedonia is allied with depression.[8],[9]

A wide array of issues such as individual motivational inclination to change as well as economic, political, and organizational background may influence the clinical practice of health-care professionals. Nevertheless, our comprehensive ability of these issues and best possible approaches to transform health-care professional behavior is deficient. This has led to more research to better update the blueprint of interventions to alter health-care professionals' behavior.[10],[11],[12],[13]

One such concept is termed as “Social reward.” It is defined as the motivational and pleasurable aspects of our interactions with other people. It is any social interaction or stimuli that a person appears to experience as rewarding or pleasurable.[7],[14]

The entire life of every human being is maintained, fostered, advanced, and enlarged on all the aspects through the energetic support of his fellow beings,[15] and the dental professionals are not an exception as we interact with patients in our practice and with our professionals and students in academics. With this background, a study was conducted with an aim to understand the various domains of the social reward of dental staff based on their academic experience.


  Materials and Methods Top


Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Research Committee. Six colleges (3 from Andhra Pradesh and 3 from Telangana) were selected randomly. All the teaching staff members working in these six colleges were invited to participate after taking permission from the head of the institution of selected colleges.

The questionnaire consisted of two parts (Part A and Part B). Part A consists of questions related to demographic data such as age, gender, and academic experience. Part B consisted of Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ) developed by Foulkes et al.[7] Permission was sought from the developers to use the questionnaire. SRQ consists of six domains [Table 1][14] with a total of 23 questions. The domain of sexual relationship was removed after assessing the content validity by a panel of experts due to cultural differences in an Indian scenario and the final SRQ consisted of five domains with 20 questions. A pilot study was conducted, and the split-half reliability (0.8105) was found to be good.
Table 1: Detail of Social Reward Questionnaire subscales

Click here to view


Following the elucidation of the study details and promising confidentiality, those staff members willing to participate and gave verbal consent were included in the study. All the participants were asked to rate each question starting with the words “I Enjoy” on a seven – point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree to 7 = strongly disagree) regarding their interactions with family members, friends, and the people they have met. The questionnaires were distributed and collected after completion before the closing hours of college.

Descriptive statistics were calculated. The mean and standard deviation from each domain were calculated separately, and the significance difference was tested using one-way ANOVA considering a P < 0.05 as statistically significant.


  Results Top


Demographic data

Two hundred and ninety staff members participated in the study, of which 164 were male. The mean age of the staff members was 33.4 ± 6.2 years and majority (55.17%) of them belonged to 31–40 years of age group. The mean academic experience of the staff members was 5.21 ± 5.2 years [Table 2].
Table 2: Demographic data

Click here to view


Comparison of each domain of Social Reward Questionnaire with academic experience

The staff members of <1 year of experience had the highest mean value with regard to admiration (22.88 ± 3.2). Negative Social Potency and Passivity had the highest mean value among the members with 6–10 years of experience, which was statistically significant (P = 0.006 and P ≤ 0.001). The mean value of pro-social interaction was found to be highest in staff members of >11 years of experience. Sociability domain had the highest mean value with regard to staff members of <1 year of academic experience, which was statistically significant (P = 0.005) [Table 3].
Table 3: Domains of Social Reward Questionnaire and academic experience

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This is the first study of its kind conducted on dental professionals. The social reward was assessed based on five subscales. By knowing how the individual members worth, different social rewards will be helpful in assessing their social behavior.[7] For the better comprehension, each subscale is discussed separately based on the academic experience of the staff members.

Admiration

The mean value of admiration was found to be the highest among the staff members of < 1 year of academic experience. This could be because the staff might have felt that appreciation is more rewarding, as being respected, receiving eulogize and support and positive feedback are a part of the professionals' rewards and identities.[16] These staff members have recently joined the institution and might have felt that earning recognition of their work is more motivating than anything else as research revealed that appreciation for work is inspiring rather than the pecuniary rewards.[17]

Research also states that people joining academics rarely consider monetary compensation as their primary motivation as salaries are generally low when compared to similarly educated professionals working outside of higher education.[18] It was noticed that skills, achievements, and talents of individuals are the basis of any organizational success, and the optimistic emotion of admiration can enhance person's enthusiasm to prove and develop one's skills and increase dedication toward their organization.[19] The dental field is no exception with regard to the above-mentioned statement.

Negative social potency

The staff members of 6–10 years of experience exhibited the highest mean value. The literature mentions that dentists experience stress in their work due to various factors such as dealing with other people that caused emotional strain of situations where they were troubled, heavy workload, and lack of positive feedback.[20] This has led to “Burnout,” a psychological condition, in which Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization are a part where a person is emotionally exhausted and develops a negative and cynical attitude toward coworkers [21] which might be one of the reasons for this finding in our study.

It was also cited that faculty members who hold position for 10 years or more experience greater stress and are dissatisfied compared to other faculty members.[22] Lack of time to conduct research and to prepare for a presentation or write a paper for publication along with difficulty in balancing family and work was the reason for dissatisfaction.[18] These reasons might have contributed to the high mean value with regard to staff with 6–10 years of experience in the present study.

The past negative experiences of the staff members of their career and attitude to establish their identity in the institution might be the other reasons. Negative Social Potency is a complex phenomenon to explain, and we cannot conclude the exact reasons behind which demands further research.

Passivity

The mean value of this domain was found to be the highest among the staff members of 6–10 years of experience. Due to a hierarchical system of administration in the present educational system, where the decision-making is not in their hands might have contributed to passivity nature among these staffs in the present study. The Dental Faculty Work Environment Survey reported that the tenured associate professors were discontent due to the sense of “being jammed” in their vocation.[18] Participants in a Tehran study [23] reported that administration did not think of consulting staff in making decisions and four in five faculties were dissatisfied with the level of autonomy in their jobs.

The above-mentioned reasons might explain to some extent why staff exhibited passivity in our study as displeased workers might develop withdrawal symptoms and their input to the organization will be trivial.[24] Further research is required on this aspect.

Pro-social interactions

The mean value of this domain found to be the highest among the staff members of >11 years of academic experience. This could be probably explained based on social exchange theory of late 1950's which states that social actions of an individual are determined by a purpose to boost one's social stand.[25] It was noticed that career satisfaction is associated with interpersonal relationships and interactions with colleagues and students.[23]

The other reason could be that as these staff members might have well established in their profession, their personal fulfillment is derived from philanthropic actions such as helping others and contributing to better the lives of their patients according to the code of ethics and ideal care that regulate their rapport with their clients.[26]

Sociability

The mean value found to be the highest among the staff members of <1 year of academic experience. As societal beings, we have learned to share our experiences with peers. By doing so, one modifies their subjective perception of these experiences in a productive manner [6] that might help excel in their personal and professional life. As these staff members, with less than a year of academic experience, are in their initial phase of their career, they might exhibit enthusiasm, vigor, and curiosity; enjoy interacting with their colleagues or seniors as the domain itself explains “I Enjoy Group Interactions.” This could be one of the reasons for the highest mean value, and other probable reasons are to be investigated.

Limitations

The research sample restricted to dental staff hence cannot be generalized to other health professionals. The voluntary participation of the dental staff might have skewed the results. The use of self-reported instrument could have led to biased responding.

Future research and recommendations

Further research should be directed to understand the concept of social reward and explore the topic in depth. As the academic lifestyles are amalgamation of aspects such as teaching, conducting research, and engage colleagues with similar concern,[18] a supportive environment is crucial which helps the staff to utilize their potential in total. The institutional and departmental heads should play a pivotal role in creating a culture of clearness and openness [27] as these staff members are a great human resource.


  Conclusion Top


The findings of the present study indicated that the staff members of more academic experience have greater reciprocal relationships. The individuals in their mid-term career tend to be passive in their profession. The staff with less experience enjoys group interactions and being appreciated.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Hossain FMA, Ali MDK. Relation between individual and society. Open J Soc Sci 2014;2:130-7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.28019. [Last accessed on 2016 Apr 08].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004;27:169-92.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Vinciarelli A, Pantic M, Heylen D, Pelachaud C, Poggi I, Errico FD, et al. Bridging the gap between social animal and unsocial machine: A survey of social signal processing. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 2012;3:69-87.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 1995;117:497-529.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rime B. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emot Rev 2009;1:60-85.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wagner U, Galli L, Schott BH, Wold A, van der Schalk J, Manstead AS, et al. Beautiful friendship: Social sharing of emotions improves subjective feelings and activates the neural reward circuitry. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2015;10:801-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Foulkes L, Viding E, McCrory E, Neumann CS. Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): Development and validation. Front Psychol 2014;5:201.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Blanchard JJ, Horan WP, Brown SA. Diagnostic differences in social anhedonia: A longitudinal study of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2001;110:363-71.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Forbes EE. Where's the fun in that? Broadening the focus on reward function in depression. Biol Psychiatry 2009;66:199-200.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004;180 6 Suppl: S57-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians' behavior: What works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22:237-43.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, et al. Changing provider behavior: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39 8 Suppl 2:II2-45.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii-iv, 1-72.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Foulkes L, McCrory EJ, Neumann CS, Viding E. Inverted social reward: Associations between psychopathic traits and self-report and experimental measures of social reward. PLoS One 2014;9:e106000.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Social Philosophy. Available from: http://www.archive.mu.ac.in/myweb_test/SYBA%20Study%20Material/soc_philoII.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 Apr 09].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gibbs JA. Maintaining the front line workers in child protection: A case for refocusing supervision. Child Abuse Rev 2001;10:323-35.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lindahl LG. What makes a good job? Personnel 1949;25:262-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Haden NK, Hendricson W, Ranney RR, Vargas A, Cardenas L, Rose W, et al. The quality of dental faculty work-life: Report on the 2007 dental school faculty work environment survey. J Dent Educ 2008;72:514-31.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Galliani EM, Vianello M. The emotion of admiration improves employees' goal orientations and contextual performance. Int J Appl Psychol 2012;2:43-52.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rada RE, Johnson-Leong C. Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:788-94.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chainani SH, Sunitha S, Reddy CV, Manjunath M, Rudraswamy S. Working conditions and personal characteristics: Predicting burnout among dental professionals in Mysore, India: A questionnaire survey. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2015;13:313-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
  Medknow Journal  
22.
National Survey of Post Secondary Faculty. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Seraj B, Ghadimi S, Mirzaee M, Ahmadi R, Bashizadeh H, Ashofteh-Yazdi K, et al. Job satisfaction and its influential factors in dental academic members in Tehran, Iran. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014;4:192-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
24.
Freund A. Commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of turnover intentions among welfare workers. Adm Soc Work 2005;29:5-21.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Spreckelmeyer KN, Krach S, Kohls G, Rademacher L, Irmak A, Konrad K, et al. Anticipation of monetary and social reward differently activates mesolimbic brain structures in men and women. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2009;4:158-65.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Stalker CA, Mandell D, Frensch KM, Harvey C, Wright M. Child welfare workers who are exhausted yet satisfied with their jobs: How do they do it? Child Fam Soc Work 2007;12:182-91.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Bucklin BA, Valley M, Welch C, Tran ZV, Lowenstein SR. Predictors of early faculty attrition at one Academic Medical Center. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:27.  Back to cited text no. 27
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1252    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded168    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]