| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 20
| Issue : 2 | Page : 193-199 |
|
|
Practices related to infection control during COVID-19 times among dental practitioners in Hubli–Dharwad: A cross-sectional survey
Hema Tyavanige Shekharappa, Prathik S Bolaar, Preetha J Shetty
Department of Public Health Dentistry, SDM College of Dental Sciences, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheswara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Correspondence Address:
Hema Tyavanige Shekharappa
Department of Public Health Dentistry, SDM College of Dental Sciences, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheswara University, Dharwad - 580 009, Karnataka
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jiaphd.jiaphd_100_21
|
|
|
Background: In view of the global crisis due to the pandemic, dental practitioners are one of the high-risk categories in acquiring and spreading the infection due to their close approximation with the oral cavity. In this regard, dentists play a major role in preventing cross-contamination by following proper infection control protocol. Aim: This study aimed to assess the practices related to infection control protocol regarding COVID-19 among dental practitioners in Hubli–Dharwad. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between September and October 2020 for 2 months. One hundred and fifteen IDA-registered dental practitioners were randomly selected, and a pretested close-ended questionnaire comprising 28 questions related to infection control practices was distributed. The questions were designed to mimic a usual clinical scenario when the patient walks in for a treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22, Chi-square test was used to compare the groups, and the value of P was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: Majority of the practitioners were following the proper infection protocol related to COVID-19. However, the proper method of donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) (59%) as well as disposal of PPE (56%) was not followed appropriately. A statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the location of the clinic the usage of consent forms (P = 0.017) and performing aerosol-generating procedures (P = 0.016). With respect to the professional years of experience, a statistically significant difference was observed related to the air conditioning of dental clinics (P = 0.031) and the type of filters installed (P = 0.007). Conclusion: Infection control protocol was followed properly by most of the practitioners; however, continuing dental education and short-term courses will add to increased awareness regarding infection control during the times of new infection.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
